Tag Archives: California

Gun Control Success: CA teacher murdered in front of students by knife.

Gun Control Success: CA teacher murdered in front of students by knife.

53 year old teacher Kellye Taylor was murdered in front of her students during recess by the father of her grandchildren, Steven Brown.

Taylor was overpowered by the younger man and fatally stabbed in the neck.

Is this what successful gun control looks like?

What I see is that an older woman who could not overpower her attacker was murdered in front of her students and could not have carried a firearm to defend herself.  The equalizer that the 2nd Amendment is supposed to guarantee would have given her a fighting chance yet was denied her.

This is the real effect that gun control has.  It disarms the law abiding and leaves vulnerable the small, the old, and the weak.  Now those who are bigger, younger and stronger can rape rob and murder without real fear of repercussions during their crime.  Sure the cops can come later and make the chalk lines and arrest the guilty for what little good it does the victim.

I would wager that the vast majority of rape victims would prefer that the only bodily fluid on them from their would be rapist was the blood splatter from where they shot the rapist dead.

How does gun control view that outcome?



Are the gun control zealots now going to focus on cutlery control? Police recovered the “sharp instrument” used in the attack.  A sharp instrument could be almost anything from a box cutter to an ice pick.  These tools have valid and legal uses but can be used improperly as well.  Of course, that is true with firearms as well yet the gun controllers don’t really care about that.

Now, gun controllers might say, “if gun control wasn’t as tough in California, Brown might have shot Taylor”.

So?  It’s not like Taylor would have ended up any more dead.  Yet, perhaps she might have survived if she had been allowed to have the tools which would have facilitated her defense.

Alas, she was denied that right and as such the war on women in California continues.


Only in California: Private party gun transfers illegal while backalley abortions just signed into law

Only in California: Private party gun transfers illegal while backalley abortions just signed into law

I really wonder about California sometimes.

The militant liberal left, the one that welcomes all voices so long as they agree with them, the one that is the most vicious and violent to those who disagree with them, the one who unabashedly infringe on everyone’s rights except those that narrowly fit into their ideology, has done it again.

Gov. Jerry Brown signed AB 154 on Wednesday allowing for non-physicians to perform abortions.  It would be one thing if that meant only handing out medication like the day after pill but the bill actually allows for non-physicians to perform invasive medical procedures in order to kill the unborn child.

Now, I have the knowledge and the steady hand to remove a person’s appendix but I doubt my zero years in medical school would cause a lineup of people at my door looking for appendectomies.

I don’t care what your stance on abortion is, outside of the most ardent pro-abortion mouth foamer out there, this can’t be considered a good idea.  The people performing these procedures aren’t even going to be trained by doctors and while the bill says the abortions will be performed under a doctor’s “supervision” there is nothing in the legislation requiring a physician to be present or on-site during an abortion.

It is not only the ridiculous decision by Gov. Brown and the CA legislature that boggles my mind but their abject hypocrisy.  They will push their agenda, regardless of how extreme yet have no problem with the complete oppression of others.

It is now LEGAL for a person who is not a physician to perform an invasive medical procedure.

It is completely ILLEGAL to sell a gun to someone else without going through a licensed dealer.

From  the Office of the California Attorney General:

Firearm sales must be conducted through a fully licensed California firearms dealer. Failure to do so is a violation of California law. The buyer (and seller, in the event that the; buyer is denied), must meet the normal firearm purchase and delivery requirements.

Yet California does not have any of the major types of abortion restrictions—such as waiting periods, mandated parental involvement or limitations on publicly funded abortions—often found in other states.

If I’m a Californian and I want to sell my over under rifle I use for skeet shooting I can’t just go to my buddy and exchange it for cash, I need to go to someone who is licensed by the state of California and have them oversee the transaction.  I have to deal with background checks, waiting periods and other infringements.

Yet if you want to undergo invasive medical procedures that will rip out and end a life/potential life (depending on your beliefs) then all you need to do is head over to the nearest abortion clinic and anyone who has taken the equivalent to watching a Grey’s Anatomy marathon can hook you up immediately.

Just a look at the numbers:

Total Number of Abortions in CA (2008): 214,190

Approx. number of murders via firearm in US (2008): 12,000

Abortions are nearly 20 times more prevalent in California than murders by firearm are in the ENTIRE United States yet California cracks down and infringes on the rights on the law abiding to keep and bear arms while streamlining the process of aborting babies by not even requiring someone with a medical degree to be involved.

Apparently the inmates have taken over the asylum in Sacramento.


Hypocrisy Continues…Lawful Eagle Murder Being Pushed Forward

Hypocrisy Continues…Lawful Eagle Murder Being Pushed Forward

An object in California is criticized by some and heralded by others.  On one hand it promotes liberty yet on the other it can cause tragedy and bloodshed.  Used properly it can be a great safety net to the people of California while improper or criminal use will result in bloodshed.  Some find them disturbing while others appreciate the benefit they provide.

Of course I am speaking of Wind Turbines.

Thought I was talking about guns?  Gimme a minute.

The murder machines that are wind turbines, while providing alternative energy and helping liberate us from foreign oil are still responsible for the declination of the Golden Eagle.


Now, if the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service follows precedent on how California handles things when it comes to the 2nd Amendment, they will no doubt sensationalize the deaths and over look the positives.  They will start a smear campaign against anyone who supports wind turbines and cheap power as hating children.  Anti-winders will say outlandish things like hoping the pro-wind people’s pets are chopped up and killed.

Yet, oddly enough, hypocrisy trumps precedent and instead of denouncing the wind turbines for the feather hating murderers that they are the US Fish and Wildlife Service are looking to ALLOW giving Wind Turbine owners an acceptable amount of “mistakes” and “tragedies”.

5 per year to be exact and 25 over a five year period.

Yet when the ban on firearms in National Parks was lifted the US Fish and Wildlife Service investigated for three months trying to derail it by saying that lead ammo was bad for the animals.

So, these turbines can kill indiscriminately any bird they want and up to 5 Golden Eagles because “accidents happen” yet my Constitutional Right does not extend into California because the actions of some lunatic somehow cause to limit my rights?

The point is, as elaborate as I made this article, that wind turbines and firearms are the same thing…tools.

Tools can be used properly or improperly.  Yet while California is banning lead ammo under the false flag of protecting animals like the Golden Eagle the deafening silence to ban Eagle Pureeing Wind Turbines is overwhelming.  Well, that’s about as hypocritical as it gets.

And yes, while I don’t disagree with hunting, I think the decimation of the Golden Eagle is a tragedy.

Attempted Mass Murder Proves It’s Time For California To Ban “Assault” Vehicles

Attempted Mass Murder Proves It’s Time For California To Ban “Assault” Vehicles

In another example of California’s wanton disregard for the safety of its citizens, the permissible culture of Sacramento allows anyone to buy an “assault” vehicle without passing a background check.

Oh sure, if they buy this killing machine on four wheels from a Licensed dealer then they may have to undergo a little credit check and the dealer will keep a record of the transaction…but what about the USED CAR LOOPHOLE!?!?!?!

The state of California, due to the Lobbying Power of the Big Three auto companies has turned a blind eye to this danger and it has proven costly.

On Saturday, August 3rd in Los Angeles, attempted serial killer Nathan Louis Campbell parked his “assault” vehicle outside a hotel and picked out his targets on the Venice Beach boardwalk.

On the surveillance video, Campbell got into a large black car, steered around a vehicle barrier and accelerated mercilessly through the crowd, hitting one person after another as bystanders tried desperately to get out of the way.

It is a miracle that only one person lost their life, it is a tragedy that it wasn’t Campbell.

But the outcry that will no doubt come will be:

“why was this psychopath allowed to purchase this car? Background checks for ALL car purchases.”

“Close the used car loophole”

“the car was black and scary, it needs to be BANNED”

“the name of the car is the Avenger…that’s scary too…BAN IT”

“There needs to be a 15mph max on all cars”

His car of choice was the Dodge Avenger, is a V-6 283 HP performance machine.  Why can’t he just drive an old slow jalopy like Henry Ford started with, it will be safer for pedestrians.

The Avenger was used in a double homicide in Detroit…BAN THEM EVERYWHERE!!!!

What?  You don’t think so?

I don’t blame you.  It’s ridiculous to think that the things in the aforementioned outcry would do anything to stop some nutjob with murder on his mind from driving his car into a crowd of people.  But that is what passes  in the gun control crowd as “logic”.

See, if Campbell had used a firearm to shoot 11 people and killing 1, rest assured that Bloomberg and his cabal of tragedy exploiting bottom feeders would be all over it.  The media would sensationalize the account and try to stoke fear into the general public to support the gun control agenda.  President Obama would get on TV and say if he had a boardwalk it would look like Venice Beach….you get the point.

I mean, this isn’t even the first mass car attack in the area.

The crash was not far from where an elderly driver sped through an open-air farmer’s market in Santa Monica in 2003, killing 10 people and injuring more than 70 others. Investigators said George Weller, who was 86 at the time, mistakenly stepped on the gas instead of the brake and then panicked. He was doing up to 60 mph when he plowed through the market.

It is easier for an 86 year old driver who can’t tell the gas from the brake  and whose reaction time is so slow he’ll hit 80 people before he can stop, to keep his license than it is for a 20 year old Iraq War veteran from getting a pistol permit in most states.



Since Campbell used a car though, then it’s all about his mental health and the “why” he did it.  No one is going to start campaigns against “assault” vehicles.  The Dodge Avenger is not going to be legislatively neutered by forcing a governor on it making the top speed 35 mph.  Black cars are not going to be banned and replaced with neon only colors with flashers of every side of it…because…you know…safety.

So come on California…lead the country like you so often like to prattle on that you do.  Pass the first comprehensive “assault” vehicle ban.  Then when you pass that, acknowledge that “assault” vehicles are really just like regular vehicles (only black) and as such you need to ban regular vehicles as well.

Finally, you can have traffic control and the “citizens” of California can give up their freedom of travel and movement to you and the public transportation you provide. Because the public can’t really be trusted with the freedom of movement, can they?

Hmmm…that idea is so whacked out crazy I wouldn’t be surprised if Sacramento gave it a try.